Now that we know that the Trump Russian Collusion narrative was a false conspiracy theory, the media is moving on. Suddenly, the notion that the political left peddled a false conspiracy theory as a way to discredit (and hopefully impeach) Trump, is a false conspiracy theory.
The Democrats, in the meantime, really did collude with Russia, using a British spy to build a fake Russian dossier, as a tool to help throw the election. That dossier, which the FBI knew was false, was used as the basis to spy on the Trump campaign. We were told by Obama Administration officials, as well as the talking heads in the media, over and over again about the tremendous amount of evidence not yet made public that would prove how Trump really did collude with Russia. The same Obama Administration officials were also, behind closed doors, telling the House Intelligence Committee that they had exactly zero evidence of Trump collusion with Russia. The whole thing was a lie, and yet outside of Fox News (which Democrats call ‘Faux News’), nobody is saying anything about it.
Now that we know Lt General Michael Flynn broke no laws, that he was setup by the FBI for a perjury trap AFTER the FBI had determined that he was innocent, and that the FBI threatened General Flynn’s family as a way to blackmail him into a guilty plea, the media has moved on. Now it is a wild conspiracy theory to believe that the Obama Administration used the FBI as a political weapon to go after General Flynn, as a part of it’s attempt to bring down Trump, starting before Trump even took office.
When Trump refused to say, during the 2016 election, that he would accept the outcome of the election regardless of the circumstances, that was called the most dangerous thing ever said in our democracy. Once Trump won the election, suddenly accepting the outcome became the most dangerous thing ever to happen in our democracy.
Joe Biden bragged that he threatened to withhold a billion dollars in aid to Ukraine, to leverage them out of investigating a company his son sat on the board of. The same Democrats not only impeached Trump for threatening to withhold aid from Ukraine (unless Ukraine looked into Biden threatening to withhold aid), but then also decided to replace Trump with the same Joe Biden who openly bragged about doing what Trump was impeached for having supposedly done. I couldn’t make up such hypocrisy if I wanted to: the presumptive Democratic nominee BRAGGED about having done what his party calls an impeachable offense, and yet this is the guy the Democrats want to elect. Stop and think about that for a minute…
Supposedly Trump is mentally unfit to serve. The solution is to elect someone who is too brain dead not to serve his handlers, rather than serving the American people.
And all of this happens as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and the rest of her Justice Democrats, work to devour the Democratic Party from within, such that they can turn the United States into a communist state.
The Democrats keep doing what they then accuse Trump of doing, and as soon as the story that Trump did something falls apart, pointing out that the Democrats did exactly what they accused Trump of becomes a wild conspiracy theory. This has been happening over and over again, for more than three years. Somehow, half the public seems to buy it.
Mark my word. The Democrats are going to do everything they can, using mail-in voting (where ballots have no chain of custody) and vote harvesting (which is even worse) to throw the 2020 election. If Nancy Pelosi gets her way, vote fraud will be institutionalized on a corporate scale. If the Democrats win this November, they will hold hearings and investigations to determine how a xenophobic, sexist, anti-gay white supremacist like Trump could ever have become President (they will not bother proving that Trump is any of those things), and they will make structural changes to ensure that no Republican ever holds national office again. Not only that, but as the Democrats end our democracy, and do so in plain sight, they will claim that they are saving our democracy.
Our economy may well already be finished, thanks to our response to Covid-19. Democrats, in the meantime, have been asking for our economy to tank for the past three years. Is it possible that the economic shutdown is more extreme than needed because Democratic governors and our media want us to go into a depression, to hurt Trump in the upcoming election? You bet it’s possible…
Is it possible that Covid-19 was in fact created in a lab with the specific goal of taking down Trump, and that globalist regimes around the world are going along with it to affect our 2020 election? That really is a wild conspiracy theory, but before you discount it completely, understand that political globalism helped this virus spread, and that Obama just two days ago said nationalism is the cause of its spread. If the media can convince the public that nationalism rather than globalism caused the virus, and that American patriotism is an evil stain upon the world, then you can stick a fork in our country politically as well.
We are very, very close to the end of our Republic.
The New York Times won three Pulitzer Prizes for it’s 1619 project, which said that the United States was born when the first slaves were brought to the New World, rather than being founded in 1776, with the Declaration of Independence, or 1789, with the ratification of the US Constitution. The New York Times won three Pulitzer Prizes for saying that slavery, rather than freedom and liberty, acted as the basis of our nation. The New York Times won three Pulitzer Prizes for saying that our Constitution is the most racist document in world history (with the possible exception of the Declaration of Independence). Somehow, after the New York Times said this, we are supposed to believe the New York Times, and other left-leaning media sources, when they say that the belief that they want to destroy the Constitution, is a wild conspiracy theory.
Think for a moment about the 1619 project, and what it means in terms of being a proud American. According to this project, slavery, genocide, racism, sexism, xenophobia, transphobia, anti-gay sentiments, and other forms of oppression by straight, cis-gendered white men, represents the ‘American Way,’ and though white supremacy predates the creation of the United States, our foundational documents (the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution) created a structural framework to perpetuate white supremacy into the future. Everything we are today is an outcropping of our white supremacist past, and whatever value our country might have, rightfully belongs to those people from whom white people (and particularly white men) stole it. Do you think that those who believe this narrative – a narrative that won three Pulitzer Prizes (ironically, not for ‘best fiction’) – will have any desire to preserve and protect the Constitution? Does it really sound like a ‘conspiracy theory’ to believe that those who hold the Constitution as the foundational document of white supremacy, might also want to shred the Constitution?
One would think that the American Public would be upset about Democratic Party attempts to destroy our Constitution, but sadly, the American Public is woefully ignorant about the Constitution. Most of us have no idea what is in it, and as such, when the media says it was written to perpetuate white supremacy, most Americans don’t know any better.
Just in case someone reading this is curious about what the Constitution says, you can get the full text here. In the meantime, the preamble specifies what the Constitution is designed to do. The preamble reads, “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” What part of that sounds racist?
Just in case someone reading this is curious about what the Declarations of Independence says, you can read the full text here. In the meantime, the meat of the Declaration of Independence can be found in the following excerpt: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.” What part of that sounds racist?
Our nation does have an oppressive history, as do all nations. Based on the text of the Declaration of Independence, the slaves in the Southern states had every right to alter or abolish their state governments, and to help institute new state governments, to help effect their safety and happiness. The slaves, of course, lacked the power to effect such change themselves, which is why the North eventually invaded the South, and forced an end to slavery. The Confederacy called the Civil War the “Second American War of Independence,” and to a degree they were right – slavery stood against the foundational principle of all people being created equal. As such, ending slavery did make the Civil War akin to a Second American War of Independence – just not in the way the Confederacy was thinking.
What have the Democrats learned in the years since the Civil War ended slavery against their will? Nothing. The Democrats still have everything backward. The Democrats still view the phrase, “All men are created equal” as racist. I can see calling it sexist (it should have said, “all people”), but racist?!? The Declaration of Independence is the exact opposite of racist. The racists were the people in the states who did not follow this principle within their state governments – and all of them were Democrats.
Quick fact.. Only one Republican ever owned slaves (Ulysses S. Grant), and he was a Democrat at the time.
To the Democrats, destroying democratic processes is the way you save our democracy, and shredding the Constitution is the way you save the Constitution. To the Democrats, patriotism is xenophobic and racist, and political globalism is patriotic. To the Democrats, our country is not worth saving, and the only way to save our country is to first destroy it.
And in keeping with Saul Alinsky’s Twelfth Rule for Radicals (“Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it“), the Democrats and the mainstream media have taken everything evil in the world and spun it into the image of Donald Trump. The Democrats use several other Alinsky rules to help personalize evil around Donald Trump as well: RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules”, RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon”, RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up”, and RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.”
A quick note on Rule 10.. Alinsky was alluding to how violence can become viewed as positive as long as the violent are spun as the underdog, and the inspiration for this rule was a Joseph Goebbels quote: “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.”
There are a number of big lies out there that try to spin violence into a positive force, committed by underdogs. One lie is that the police hunt black men. Another lie is that white supremacy is a major problem in our country. Another lie is that white people hunt black people down with impunity. The truth? 52 percent of all murders are committed by black people. Of crimes where the people involved are black and white, 85% have a black perpetrator and a white victim – only 15% have a white perpetrator and a black victim. We have, in fact, the least racist nation on Earth. You’ll never hear these statistics in the mainstream media, in spite of the fact that if you click those links, they are all government sources. According to the Democrats and our media, the exact opposite of the truth is true.
It is true that when white people murder black people, they sometimes get off. It is also true that when black people murder white people, they sometimes get off, that when white people murder white people, they sometimes get off, and that when black people murder black people, they sometimes get off. Our media loves to spin specific cases as if they are part of a larger narrative (and loves to pick the most divisive cases to focus on), but the real driving force behind people getting off is that our Constitution ensures a presumption of innocence, requiring that a person be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt before they can be locked up. Every American is given those protections, and yes – it goes without saying that a system designed to error on the side of letting guilty people go (to avoid locking up innocent people) will sometimes let a guilty person go. It is very easy to look at specific cases and call our system of justice flawed, and it is particularly easy to do that when you don’t have to come up with a better system to compare our system to.
Guess what – there isn’t a better system of justice out there.
We can see what Democrats think of justice by comparing their handling of Brett Kavanaugh’s accuser to their handling of Joe Biden’s accuser.
If destroying the United States is the goal, then the mainstream media, and the Democratic Party, are doing a pretty good job.
The Democrats, and the mainstream media, think we are pretty stupid, and they are largely correct. How correct are they? We will find out this November.
And if the Democrats win, they will end our Republic, while telling us they are saving it, in what will become the biggest lie of all.
